Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Armstrong, Michael |
---|---|
Titel | The Cambridge Primary Review: A Reply to R. J. Campbell |
Quelle | In: FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 52 (2010) 2, S.151-153 (3 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0963-8253 |
DOI | 10.2304/forum.2010.52.2.151 |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Reader Response; Criticism; Program Proposals; Curriculum Development; Educational Principles; Educational Objectives |
Abstract | The author was disappointed by R. J. Campbell's sour critique of the Cambridge Primary Review in "FORUM" Volume 52 Number 1 2010. His description of the Review's proposals on curriculum and pedagogy as "backward-looking, cumbersome and partial" is such a bizarre misjudgement that it calls for some response. The author comments in turn on R. J. Campbell's criticism of the Review's twelve aims for the primary curriculum, his doubts about the curriculum domains outlined, and his discussion of pedagogy. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Symposium Books. P.O. Box 204, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 9ZQ, UK. Tel: +44-1235-818-062; Fax: +44-1235-817-275; e-mail: subscriptions@symposium-journals.co.uk; Web site: http://www.wwwords.co.uk/forum |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |